4. Case Study: Asset Allocation During the Samsung Strike
4.1 Scenario Simulation
Suppose an investor has two allocations:
| Allocation |
Content |
| Allocation A |
TSMC 40% + MediaTek 20% + US tech ETF 30% + cash 10% |
| Allocation B |
TSMC 30% + MediaTek 15% + US tech ETF 20% + Cape Town property 25% + cash 10% |
Suppose the Samsung strike causes the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index to fall 15%, TSMC to fall 12%, MediaTek to fall 10% and the US tech ETF to fall 8%:
- 1Allocation A loss: (-12%×0.4) + (-10%×0.2) + (-8%×0.3) + (0%×0.1) = -9.2%
- 2Allocation B loss: (-12%×0.3) + (-10%×0.15) + (-8%×0.2) + (0%×0.25) + (0%×0.1) = -6.1%
Conclusion: because Allocation B put 25% into Cape Town property, its loss was 3.1 percentage points smaller.
4.2 Not Just "Falling Less," But "Falling Steadily"
Allocation A's problem is not just that it "falls more," but that:
1. High emotional stress: watching all your stocks fall together creates panic. 2. Forced stop-losses: when declines trigger stop-loss lines or margin calls, you are forced to sell at the lows. 3. Long recovery time: a larger rebound is needed just to break even.
Allocation B's advantages:
1. Emotional stability: Cape Town property provides steady rental income that offsets part of the losses. 2. No stop-loss needed: real estate does not require daily monitoring and carries no liquidity pressure. 3. Faster recovery: smaller declines mean a smaller rebound is required.